It has been a constant struggle with Railway Parade.
|
evolution of retail study models |
Initially it was a office building, but due to low demand on office space, we changed to residential. At first Council was thrilled with the residential proposal and gave us incentives in parking requirement - which they eventually took back months later. The parking requirement attached with residential development was unfeasible for our site, so we ended up with a fully commercial retail development which has no parking requirement.
So, what is the difference with designing retail development?
|
This is the scheme we decided to go ahead with. |
Retail fitout is an art form in itself. Retail development is the envelop for that art.
What we have here to work with as architects, is the envelop - the skin inbetween the retail fitout and the weather, the most primitive definition of architecture: "shelter".
Here we derived the concept of defining that skin with its supporting structure, and condensing the service pod (WC, exhaust, air conditioning plant, garbage collection...etc) into a compact box for maximum efficiency. In a purist kind of way, the envelop and the box are serving the spaces in a very different capacity, therefore they should be detached from each other.
|
latest study model. detaching skin and box....but just how do we go about doing it structurally? |
The issue is that the shopfront window facing the street is subject to a lateral wind load, which will be pushing the structure sideways and that lateral force needs to be transferred into ground somehow - transferring to the box at rear seems a natural thing to do, which in turn contradicts with the "detaching" of skin and box. I think it has been at least 3 days now....for us to get our heads around way of detaching skin and box.... either way we are going for different degrees of "attaching", and never fully succeeded in "detaching".
|
This is beauty of architecture though. |
Our job is to construct in reality, not in virtual reality. The art comes in how we can materialise the concept in a physical environment; bearing in mind that even though everything seems possible with the advancement of computer rendering and 3 D modelling, when in reality, it is not. It is when we have to bring all kinds of fields together, conduct the team towards a vision and direction in order to achieve, not mere "building", but "architecture".
It is another exciting battle we are marching into (after a long battle with program and function and concept)... I think we need to call out to our friendly alliance, the structural engineer, after some more studying and formulating of options...
|
earlier presentation perspective of the mixed retail/ residential scheme, showing the existing building at front (which we are yet to make for the retail studies). It was a nice scheme, but after the distillation of program, function, aesthetic, the current scheme is much stronger and pure. Obstacles can surely be blessing in disguise..... |